ATLAS Aerospace LLC v. Advanced Transportation, Inc., Case No. 12-1200-JWL (U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, April 24, 2013). Free copy from the court available here.
The legal take-away is entirely unremarkable. A simple reading of the Carmack Amendment (49 U.S. Code § 14706) reveals that the Carmack Amendment does not apply to a “broker” but instead to a “carrier”.
Applicable “broker” and “carrier” definitions (49 U.S. Code § 13102) are mutually exclusive.
Non lawyers should assure themselves that counsel understand transportation law before paying them to bring expensive litigation.
Lawyers should know what they are doing before they file pleadings.
Not to be snarky, but there is no excuse for any lawyer bringing a lawsuit against a “broker” under the Carmack Amendment, or with Carmack Amendment defenses being raised with respect to the actions of a “broker”.